Pantagraph Editorial
Congress should be able to 'agree to disagree'

February 28, 2005

Partisan politics has grown increasingly personal and strident. That may fire up the hard-core party faithful, but it risks turning off the middle majority. In addition, it can cause good public servants to throw in the towel and qualified people to decide against running for office.

U.S. Reps. Tim Johnson of Urbana and Steve Israel of Long Island , N.Y. , face a formidable challenge in attempting to create a caucus of congressmen committed to greater civility. But they deserve all the help and encouragement they can get -- for their sake and for the country's future.

U.S. Rep. Ray LaHood, a Peoria Republican, made a similar effort nearly a decade ago with former Rep. David Skaggs, D-Colo. They organized family retreats so congressmen could get to know each other, as well as spouses. But the strong interest that greeted the effort faded in later years.

Johnson and Israel are taking a slightly different approach. Their intent is to bring together congressmen who can "agree to disagree" but do so with respect and find areas of agreement and compromise.

Johnson admitted in a meeting with The Pantagraph Editorial Board that it will be tough to bring about changes in attitude. But he said the situation will never change unless those who are disturbed by it take the issue on.

He thinks the smaller number of congressional seats that are truly competitive each election "brings out the worst instincts" in some politicians.

Citizens perpetuate the problem by rewarding those baser instincts with their votes -- and even by staying home on Election Day.

It is possible to compromise on the details of particular legislation without compromising one's principles. More elected officials should recognize that and more voters should reward them for it.

Johnson's involvement in the "civility" caucus is a step in the right direction.